The ARC Daily DigestARC PRIZE 2026 / THE SEASON IN FOUR ACTS
The open-source season

The Duck That Launched
a Thousand Ships

How Qwen and a very well-travelled Duck changed the starting line in ARC-3.

A small brown turkey poult sitting in Mark Barney’s hand by a window on May 6, 2026
May 6, 2026 · Team Turducken

A bird in the hand.
A team on 0.28.

It is a turkey. The Duck is in the software.

On May 6, this little bird sat in Mark Barney’s hand and Team Turducken’s best ARC-3 score was 0.28. On November 2, the same team stands on 56.02.

0.28May 6 · public best
56.02November 2 · public best

“I just got distracted looking at pictures of turkeys,” says Barney, the Digest’s editor and a Team Turducken competitor.

On September 30, a bronze-medal score in ARC-AGI-3 was 4.04. Two days later it was 25.04. The number of teams on the board barely changed.

This investigation began with Cristiano Calcagno’s question: how much of teams’ progress tracks improvements in the models underneath them?

The evidence

One season. Four very different climbs.

ARC-AGI-3 public scores · March 25 through the latest observation

Swipe the chart sideways, or choose a chapter for a closer look.

Select a model or notebook marker for its date and source. Faint dots below the plot are coding tools only.

Log scale keeps the early gains visible. Before October 4, the daily history carries each team’s last observed score forward; exact jump days are approximate. Later medal lines use our saved board readings. Dates are UTC.

Season history with thanks to Tong Hui Kang. Fixed ranks offer a comparison unaffected by the changing medal cutoffs.

Event sources and date precision
Accessible daily values for the selected chapter
Act I / The Duck

A solver others could build on

Tufa Labs won the first milestone with the Duck, running Qwen 3.6 27B. Around July 1, the solver was opened to the field. It gave the model a Python tool for investigating games and taking actions: a runnable starting point that other competitors could inspect, adapt and improve.

The opening of the Milestone 1 solutions, led by the Duck, was followed by a broad lift across the medal lines. From June 30 to July 5, gold rises from 0.70 to 1.32, silver from 0.44 to 1.08 and bronze from 0.38 to 0.85. All three roughly double in five days. At this stage, the gains are small enough to vanish near the floor of a season-long linear chart. On the logarithmic view, the first lift is unmistakable.

The Duck mattered as a piece of shared engineering. Its influence can be traced directly to one of the next milestone’s winners.

The turkeys had hatched beside Barney’s computers that spring. The wild ones can fly and are not too friendly, Barney points out. Generations of breeding have made these “big, fat, and friendly.”

Act II / The Model

The leaders find another gear

In August, the model inside that loop changed. Qwen 3.8 27B arrived on August 14, followed by Flash Next on August 26. By September 15, the top score is 18.81, up from 1.86 on August 5. Bronze moves from 1.19 to 3.43. The whole field is no longer climbing together.

Daniel Franzen supplies a firsthand account of the model changes: “Better models help a lot.” His write-up credits substantial improvements to each move from Qwen 3.6 27B to Qwen 3.8 27B and then Flash Next. His work also changed how the solver saw games, retained useful code and spent its time. The result combined a stronger model with improvements around it.

The hardware limit matters here. A competition notebook must run offline, within its allotted machine and time. The coding assistants shown faintly beneath the chart could help write the system; they could not be called as cloud APIs during its scored run. An open model that fits the notebook is what gets to play.

“There’s something special over there in the training pipeline at Alibaba.”Mark Barney, ARC Daily Digest editor and Team Turducken competitor, after reading many traces from these models.

Barney, who has watched Tufa’s Machine Learning Street Talk appearance several times, recalls the team singling out Qwen 3.6 as special. The episode listing identifies Tufa as an MLST sponsor.

Act III / The Deadline and the Flood

What had been an advantage became a starting point

Tufa’s own score rises from 18.81 on September 25 to 50.65 on September 30. Then the Milestone 2 notebooks go public together. The deadline was 23:59 UTC on September 30. Work that had carried the leaders through the milestone was suddenly available to everyone.

Franzen’s released notebook runs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next and reports a public score of 27.89. His write-up explicitly credits Tufa’s Duck as its foundation. By October 2, bronze has risen from 4.04 to 25.04, and silver is near 28. The field has grown by less than three per cent.

The individual histories make the scale of the change clearer. In the daily record, 185 teams jump from below 10 into the 25-to-35 band on October 1, followed by 83 on October 2. Nothing like that wave appears before the deadline. On October 1, Maren Sajdaras rises from 3.78 to 32.29.

Franzen’s notebook became the busiest public door into that new range. By November 2, Kaggle showed 2,113 copies started, far ahead of the other notebooks checked. The next highest, at 569, was itself Franzen’s notebook with two cells changed. Copies are not competitors—one person can start several—but the line of descent is visible in the code.

Tufa’s Duck →Public solver and notebook
Milestone 1
Franzen →Explicit credit to the Duck
Milestone 2 · 27.89
Team TurduckenBuilt on Franzen’s notebook
Mark Barney’s firsthand account

For Team Turducken, the connection is firsthand: Barney says the team built on Franzen’s notebook. Other teams’ jumps suggest the spread of shared methods; their scores cannot tell us which notebook they used.

Here is the clearest answer the season gives Cristiano. A better model helped make the leap possible. Shared engineering delivered it to the crowd. Flash Next was five weeks old when the field jumped; the public record cannot divide the credit between the model and the work around it.

Act IV / The Long Tail

The starting point stayed. The leaders moved.

Inside the public notebooks

Qwen dominates the models we can identify

Of the 300 most-voted public ARC-3 notebooks, the census identifies named or likely model use in 139. It assigns 129 to Qwen—75 named, 54 inferred. Flash Next leads with 70: 49 name it, and another 21 attach its runtime with the model name hidden.

These notebooks show what was available to copy, including many copies of the same recipe. The leaders’ current submissions remain private.

The middle pile is the season’s lasting shape. Some of its gradual rise may be the reward for trying again: another run can beat the previous one without a change of method. The gap to the leaders is a different order of climb.

The Duck’s contribution was not exhausted when another team passed its score. Its descendants kept competing. The question now is how much of the public progress survives the private evaluation.

The field left behind

Two piles. Very little in the middle.

Every team in each dated public snapshot · five-point score bins

ARC-AGI-3

Tap or focus a bar for its exact count.

ARC-AGI-2

Tap or focus a bar for its exact count.

Each bar covers five score points, with its lower boundary included.

The ending still unwritten

Waiting for Qwen 4

Qwen 4 was the release to watch because it could have reset the contest: a new model to fit, test and submit before the bell. As of 06:07 UTC on November 2, Qwen had published no Qwen 4 weights.

The bell rings tonight at 6:59 Eastern. Then the private board will put the public gains to the test. Back at home, the turkeys have outgrown the nesting box. The team on 0.28 in May has a score of 56.02 to defend. A turducken has a duck inside it. So does our notebook.